What changes did H.R. 1 introduce to SNAP?

• A. Expanded work requirements, fewer exemptions, stricter non-citizen eligibility, and funding changes.
• B. Tightened cash grants for SNAP recipients with longer processing times.
• C. Expanded eligibility for non-citizens and increased monthly benefits.
• D. Introduced universal basic income for SNAP recipients.

Answer: (A)

H.R. 1 proposed SNAP reforms that tighten access and funding rather than expanding benefits. The main idea is to require more people to engage in work or work-related activities to keep benefits, while reducing the number of exemptions that currently shield some recipients from those requirements. By narrowing non-citizen eligibility, the bill would restrict who can receive assistance based on immigration status, making it harder for some immigrant households to qualify. It also changes how SNAP is funded, aiming to alter the financial structure—potentially shifting costs or altering benefit levels and state roles.

This combination—more work requirements, fewer exemptions, stricter non-citizen eligibility, and funding changes—fits the typical approach to reforming SNAP in policy debates, whereas the other options describe scenarios that don’t align with those reform levers. For example, mentioning longer processing times or cash-like grants mischaracterizes SNAP’s delivery, and suggesting expanded non-citizen eligibility or increased benefits would run counter to a tightening reform. Universal basic income is outside SNAP’s scope.